Eli Lilly and Company v. Ed Partners, LLC
| Eli Lilly and Company |
| Ed Partners, LLC doing business as Cleveland Health Group |
| 1:2024cv01035 |
| June 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Solomon Oliver |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Second Motion for extension of time until 08/28/2024 to answer filed by Plaintiff Eli Lilly and Company. (Cavanagh, Matthew) |
Order [non-document] granting the Parties' #8 Second Joint Motion for extension of time until 08/28/2024 to answer. Ed Partners, LLC answer due 8/28/2024.. Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 8/7/2024. (R,Sh)
|
| Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Benjamin J. Foote-Huth filed by on behalf of Eli Lilly and Company. (Foote-Huth, Benjamin) |
|
Order [non-document] granting the Parties' #6 Joint Motion for extension of time until 08/07/2024 to answer. Ed Partners, LLC answer due 8/7/2024. Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 7/12/2024.(R,Sh)
|
| Filing 6 Joint Motion for extension of time until 08/07/2024 to answer filed by Plaintiff Eli Lilly and Company. (Cavanagh, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service by personal service executed upon Ed Partners, LLC on 6/26/2024, filed on behalf of Eli Lilly and Company Related document(s) #4 . (Cavanagh, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Ed Partners, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,AP) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Eli Lilly and Company. (Cavanagh, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Eli Lilly and Company. (Cavanagh, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for trademark infringement, false advertising, false designation of origin, and deceptive trade practices with jury demand against Ed Partners, LLC. Filing fee paid, $405.00. Receipt number AOHNDC-12610164. Filed by Eli Lilly and Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Trademark Registrations), #2 Exhibit B (Websites and Social Media), #3 Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cavanagh, Matthew) |
| Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. assigned to case. (R,AP) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Reuben J. Sheperd. (R,AP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eli Lilly and Company v. Ed Partners, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eli Lilly and Company | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin J. Foote-Huth |
| Represented By: | Matthew J. Cavanagh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ed Partners, LLC doing business as Cleveland Health Group | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
