International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
| International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
| 1:2025cv00082 |
| January 16, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Patricia A Gaughan |
| Labor: Railway Labor Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Motion for attorney Andrew J. Rolfes to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12994761, filed by Respondent Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Andrew J. Rolfes)(Santoro, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 Motion for attorney Robert S. Hawkins to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-12994737, filed by Respondent Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Robert S. Hawkins)(Santoro, Joseph) |
Order [non-document]: Respondent Norfolk Southern Railway Company's Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of attorney Robert S. Hawkins is granted. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #6 ). District Judge Patricia A Gaughan on 3/10/25. (LC,S)
|
|
Order [non-document]: Respondent Norfolk Southern Railway Company's Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of attorney Andrew J. Rolfes is granted. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #7 ). District Judge Patricia A Gaughan on 3/10/25. (LC,S)
|
| Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Joseph J. Santoro filed by on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Santoro, Joseph) |
|
Order [non-document]: Due to a scheduling conflict, the telephonic Case Management Conference set for March 27, 2025 at 9:15 a.m. is rescheduled to March 26, 2025 at 9:45 a.m. District Judge Patricia A Gaughan on 2/11/25. (LC,S)
|
| Filing 4 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with Case Management Conference set on 3/27/2025 at 9:15 a.m. to be held telephonically before District Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. District Judge Patricia A Gaughan on 2/4/2025. (H,AR) |
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division. Norfolk Southern Railway Company waiver sent on 1/22/2025, answer due 3/24/2025 filed on behalf of International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division (Scheck, Bailey) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons not provided and was not issued. (B,Ch) |
| Filing 1 Petition to Enforce Public Law Board Awards Under the Railway Labor Act against Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Filing fee paid $ 405.00, Receipt number AOHNDC-12912999. Filed by International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 M.T. Russell Award, #3 A.J. White Award). (Scheck, Bailey) |
| District Judge Patricia A Gaughan assigned to case. (B,Ch) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes, Jr. (B,Ch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division | |
| Represented By: | Bailey S. Scheck |
| Represented By: | Erika A. Diehl-Gibbons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
| Represented By: | Joseph J. Santoro |
| Represented By: | Robert S. Hawkins |
| Represented By: | Andrew J. Rolfes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
