Williams, et al. vs. Crosby, et al.
| Shawn Williams, Kathleen Williams, P. W., S. W., J. W. and K. W. |
| Randal Williams, Village of Whitehouse, Mark McDonough, Ronald Shellhammer and Amanda Crosby |
| 3:2013cv02041 |
| September 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Lucas |
| Vernelis K. Armstrong |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
Memorandum Opinion and Order. Pending before this Court are Defendant Officers Amanda Crosby and Randall Williams' Objections to the 3 Amended Report & Recommendation. This Court sustains in part and overrules in part Defendants' Objections. Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 21 is granted in part and denied in part. This Court concludes claims remain against Crosby and R. Williams. See Memorandum Opinion and Order for details. Judge Jack Zouhary on 8/12/2014. (D,L)
|
|
Filing
39
Order. Status Phone Conference held on 5/20/2014. This Court adopts those portions of the Magistrate Judge's Amended R&R 31 to which no party objected. As agreed during the phone status, Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant McD onough are dismissed without prejudice. The case schedule dates previously set are vacated (see Doc. 20 ). This Court will discuss a revised case schedule at the next phone status to be held after initial depositions are completed. Judge Jack Zouhary on 5/21/2014. (30 mins)(D,L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
