Rogers v. Bodenbender
Plaintiff: George C. Rogers
Defendant: Michael D. Bodenbender
Case Number: 3:2015cv02514
Filed: December 4, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Toledo Office
County: Henry
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J. Helmick
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Memorandum Opinion: Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. In addition, I decline the Defendant's request for attorney fees or other relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(3). re 8 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 12/21/2016. (S,AL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogers v. Bodenbender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George C. Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael D. Bodenbender
Represented By: Donald E. Theis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?