McDaniel v. Commissioner of Social Security
Tonda K. McDaniel |
Nancy A. Berryhill and Commisioner of Social Security |
3:2018cv02071 |
September 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
David A Ruiz |
Jack Zouhary |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #6 Motion to withdraw as attorney. Harry J. Binder removed from case. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 9/18/2018. (G,CA) |
Filing 6 Motion by Harry J. Binder to withdraw as attorney filed by Plaintiff Tonda K. McDaniel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Binder, Charles) Modified on 9/24/2018 (no signature block) (D,TM). |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 9/13/2018. (G,CA) |
Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Grant E. Felbaum filed by on behalf of Tonda K. McDaniel. (Felbaum, Grant) |
Filing 3 Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon Commisioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (D,TM) |
Filing 2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 9/11/2018. (D,TM) |
Notice to Attorney Harry J. Binder. The Court finds no record of your being admitted to practice in the Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to LR 83.5, an Application for Admission to Practice or a Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in this case must be filed within 10 business days. The local rules and the attorney admission application are available on the court's web site at: www.ohnd.uscourts.gov. If you are not the attorney of record in this case, a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney pursuant to LR 83.9 must be filed within 10 business days. (P,WL) |
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (D,TM) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (D,TM) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz pursuant to Local Rule 72.2.. Judge Jack Zouhary on 9/11/2018. (D,TM) |
Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (D,TM) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8900292. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to terminated civil action 3:11-cv-01997-DAK. Filed by Tonda K. McDaniel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (Felbaum, Grant) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.