Howton v. Haviland
Brooks D. Howton |
Warden James Haviland |
3:2019cv00071 |
January 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Kathleen B Burke |
Jack Zouhary |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by Hilda Rosenberg filed by on behalf of James Haviland. (Rosenberg, Hilda) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order: Respondent shall file an Answer (Return of Writ) to the petition within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. Petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the filing of Respondent's Return of Writ to file a Reply (Traverse). Respondent shall have fifteen (15) days from the filing of Petitioner's Traverse to respond thereto. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 2/4/2019. (D, I) |
Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) mailed to Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, 30 E. Broad St., 14th Floor, Columbus, OH 43215; Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) and #5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order mailed to James Haviland WARDEN at Allen Oakwood Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 4501, Lima, OH 45802; And #5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order mailed to Brooks D. Howton #726-371 at Allen Oakwood Correctional Institution, PO Box 4501, Lima, OH 45802. (D, I) |
Filing 4 Order granting Petitioner's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 1/22/2019.(D, I) |
Copy of #4 Order on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis mailed to Brooks D. Howton #726-371 and Warden James Haviland at Allen Oakwood Correctional Institution, PO Box 4501, Lima, OH 45802 on 1/22/2019. (D, I) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Jack Zouhary on 1/15/2019. (D,L) |
Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,L) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Brooks D. Howton. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Prisoner, #2 Cashier Statement, #3 Inmate Demand Statement)(M,L) |
Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Brooks D. Howton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (M,L) |
Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (M,L) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (M,L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Howton v. Haviland | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden James Haviland | |
Represented By: | Hilda Rosenberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Brooks D. Howton | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.