Handy Twine Knife Company, Inc. v. Zenport Industries, Inc. et al
| Handy Twine Knife Company, Inc. |
| Zenport Industries, Inc. and Durokon, LLC |
| 3:2019cv00335 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Marginal Entry Order granting #6 Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney J. Michael Huget for Plaintiff Handy Twine Knife Company, Inc. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. The CM/ECF registration form can be found at www.ohnd.uscourts.gov under Forms. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. Judge Jack Zouhary on 2/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 ACTL Code of Conduct)(D,L) |
| Filing 6 Motion for attorney J. Michael Huget to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-9151418, filed by Plaintiff Handy Twine Knife Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit J. Michael Huget)(Hyde, Mary) |
| Filing 5 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Handy Twine Knife Company, Inc.. (Hyde, Mary) |
| Filing 4 Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 2/14/2019. (R,Ke) |
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Durokon, LLC, Zenport Industries, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,Ke) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Handy Twine Knife Company, Inc.. (Hyde, Mary) |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (R,Ke) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (R,Ke) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (R,Ke) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400. Receipt number 0647-9149511. Filed by Handy Twine Knife Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - TM Reg. No. 5,404,205, #2 Exhibit B - TM Reg. No. 3,172,887, #3 Exhibit C - TM Reg. No. 3,019,308, #4 Exhibit D - Handy-Zenport Letter 08-27-18, #5 Exhibit E - Zenport Email Reply 09-15-18, #6 Exhibit F - Handy-Durokon Letter 08-31-18, #7 Exhibit G - Defendant Webpages, #8 Exhibit H - Zenport Amazon Store Page, #9 Exhibit I - Durokon Website, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Summons) (Hyde, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
