Civista Bank v. Shoreline Business Solutions, Inc. et al
| Civista Bank |
| Gemalto, Inc. and Shoreline Business Solutions, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv02145 |
| September 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jack Zouhary |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER. Initial Phone Status held on 10/16/19. With agreement of Court and counsel, Settlement Conference set for 12/13/19 at 1:30 PM in Chambers 203 before Judge Jack Zouhary. Lead counsel and party attendance required. Ex parte statements due 3 days before the conference. In the interim, all legal filings are stayed until after the Settlement Conference. (30 min) Judge Jack Zouhary on 10/18/19. (S,Na)
|
| NOTICE [non-document] of Initial Phone Status set for 10/16/19 at 9:30 AM before Judge Jack Zouhary. At that time, counsel shall call the District Court conference line. No dispositive motions shall be filed prior to the Initial Phone Status. (S,Na) |
| Filing 7 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Civista Bank. Shoreline Business Solutions, Inc. waiver sent on 9/18/2019, answer due 11/18/2019 filed on behalf of Civista Bank (Bedell, James) |
| Filing 6 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Civista Bank. Gemalto, Inc. waiver sent on 9/18/2019, answer due 11/18/2019 filed on behalf of Civista Bank (Bedell, James) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Civista Bancshares, Inc. for Civista Bank filed by Civista Bank. (Gurbach, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 9/17/2019. (M,L) |
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Gemalto, Inc., Shoreline Business Solutions, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,L) |
| Filing 2 Attorney Appearance by James Richard Bedell filed by on behalf of Civista Bank. (Bedell, James) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9527417. Filed by Civista Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Shoreline Business Solutions, Inc. , #4 Summons Gemalto, Inc. ) (Gurbach, Matthew) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (M,L) |
| Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (M,L) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (M,L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
