Calderas v. AK Tube, LLC
Plaintiff: Carlos Calderas
Defendant: AK Tube, LLC
Case Number: 3:2019cv02431
Filed: October 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29:201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against AK Tube, LLC. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9580672.. Filed by Carlos Calderas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Calderas Consent to Join, #2 Exhibit B - February 6 - February 12, 2017 Pay Stub, #3 Exhibit C - April 9 - April 15, 2018 Pay Stub, #4 Exhibit D - February 13 - February 19, 2017 Pay Stub, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Coffman, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Calderas v. AK Tube, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AK Tube, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Calderas
Represented By: Matthew J.P. Coffman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?