U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hall et al
| United States Securities and Exchange Commission and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Arthur Hall and Rising Biosciences, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv01597 |
| August 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James R Knepp |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document] granting #5 Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney L. Sean Mathis for Arthur Hall and Rising Biosciences, Inc. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. Judge James R. Knepp II on 10/15/2021. (S,JM)
|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Rising Biosciences, Inc.. (Fraley, Joshua) |
| Notice by Clerk that Rising Biosciences, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (O,K) |
| Filing 5 Motion for attorney L. Sean Mathis to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11078977, filed by Arthur Hall, Rising Biosciences, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Fraley, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Joshua M. Fraley filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Fraley, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. All Defendants filed on behalf of United States Securities and Exchange Commission (Polish, Jonathan) Modified on 10/13/2021 (O,K). |
| Filing 2 Original Summons (4) and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Arthur Hall (and c/o L. Sean Mathis, attorney), Rising Biosciences, Inc.(and c/o L. Sean Mathis, attorney). (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,L) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants.. Filing fee exempt. Filed by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (Polish, Jonathan) |
| Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (M,L) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (M,L) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (M,L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
