Woodmore v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Melissa Woodmore |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 3:2021cv02031 |
| October 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| William H Baughman |
| James G Carr |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Proposed Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge and Order of Reference, filed ONLY by Melissa Woodmore. (Friedes, David) |
Filing 5
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 10/27/21. (D,Ky)
|
| Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 10/27/2021. (K,AR) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge James G. Carr on 10/27/2021. (K,AR) |
|
Order [non-document] granting plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 10/27/21.(D,Ky)
|
| Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (K,AR) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr.. (K,AR) |
| Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (K,AR) |
| Filing 3 Supplement - Certificate of Service, filed by Melissa Woodmore. (Friedes, David) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Melissa Woodmore. (Friedes, David) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Melissa Woodmore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Cause of action, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 USM-285, #7 USM-285, #8 USM-285) (Friedes, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woodmore v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Melissa Woodmore | |
| Represented By: | David E. Friedes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Rema Alberta Ina |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
