DG Auto Parts LLC, et al v. US Dept. of Homeland Security
Plaintiff: DG AUTO PARTS, LLC and justin carnevale
Defendant: United States of America, U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Case Number: 3:2022cv00186
Filed: February 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James R Knepp
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2022 Filing 4 Stipulation & Order dismissing case without prejudice. Judge James R. Knepp II on 3/22/2022. (B,JL)
March 22, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) without prejudice filed by All Plaintiffs. (Orlandini, David)
February 2, 2022 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon United States of America, U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,EM)
February 2, 2022 Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (R,EM)
February 2, 2022 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (R,EM)
February 2, 2022 Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (R,EM)
February 1, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint and Motion to Set Aside Declaration of Forfeiture against United States of America Department of Homeland Security. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11250699. Filed by DG Auto Parts, LLC and Justin Carnevale. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Orlandini, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DG Auto Parts LLC, et al v. US Dept. of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DG AUTO PARTS, LLC
Represented By: David W. Orlandini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: justin carnevale
Represented By: David W. Orlandini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America, U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?