Fuller v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Bradley D. Fuller
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2022cv00197
Filed: February 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Darrell A Clay
Referring Judge: James R Knepp
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Transcript of Proceedings before the Social Security Administration filed by Commissioner of Social Security. (Staley Rafferty, Cara)
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice of Substitution of Counsel removing attorney Mary T. Meadows and adding attorney Jon H. Ressler filed by on behalf of Bradley D. Fuller. (Ressler, Jon)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (R,Ke)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 2/4/2022. (R,Ke)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Certificate Confirming Notification of Case Information filed by Bradley D. Fuller. (Ressler, Jon)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan.Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 2/4/2022. (R,EM)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint Appeal of Social Security Denial against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11256133. Filed by Bradley D. Fuller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ressler, Jon)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge James R. Knepp II on 2/4/2022. (R,EM)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (R,EM)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (R,EM)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (R,EM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fuller v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bradley D. Fuller
Represented By: Jon H. Ressler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Cara Staley Rafferty
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?