Stokes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Dionne Jermaine Stokes
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2022cv00584
Filed: April 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Darrell A Clay
Referring Judge: Jeffrey J Helmick
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2022 Filing 8 Transcript of Proceedings before the Social Security Administration filed by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Related document(s) #1 . (Ina, Rema)
April 12, 2022 Filing 7 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (R,Ke)
April 12, 2022 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 4/12/2022. (R,Ke)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay on 4/12/2022.(R,Ke)
April 12, 2022 Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 4/12/2022. (R,EM)
April 12, 2022 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay pursuant to Local Rule 72.2.Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 4/12/2022. (R,EM)
April 12, 2022 Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (R,EM)
April 12, 2022 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (R,EM)
April 12, 2022 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (R,EM)
April 11, 2022 Filing 3 Supplement - Certificate of Service, filed by Dionne Jermaine Stokes. (Friedes, David)
April 11, 2022 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Dionne Jermaine Stokes. (Friedes, David)
April 11, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Dionne Jermaine Stokes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit cause of action, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 USM-285, #7 USM-285, #8 USM-285) (Friedes, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stokes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dionne Jermaine Stokes
Represented By: David E. Friedes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Rema Alberta Ina
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?