Luxon v. Teijin Automotive Technologies, Inc.
| Michael Ann Luxon |
| Teijin Automotive Technologies |
| 3:2022cv01912 |
| October 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jeffrey J Helmick |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Answer to #1 Complaint, filed by Teijin Automotive Technologies. (Borgman, Adam) |
| Filing 4 Attorney Appearance of Nelson D. Cary and Adam M. Borgman by Adam M. Borgman filed by on behalf of Teijin Automotive Technologies. (Borgman, Adam) |
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Michael Ann Luxon. Teijin Automotive Technologies waiver sent on 10/25/2022, answer due 12/26/2022 filed on behalf of Michael Ann Luxon (Sabo Friedmann, Rachel) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons issued. None were provided. (S,Ja) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Teijin Automotive Technologies, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11679107.. Filed by Michael Luxon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit EEOC RTS) (Sabo Friedmann, Rachel) |
| Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick assigned to case. (S,Ja) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (S,Ja) |
| Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a). (S,Ja) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Luxon v. Teijin Automotive Technologies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Ann Luxon | |
| Represented By: | Peter G. Friedmann |
| Represented By: | Rachel Sabo Friedmann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Teijin Automotive Technologies | |
| Represented By: | Adam M. Borgman |
| Represented By: | Nelson D. Cary |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
