Wolcott et al v. Willis of Ohio, Inc. et al
||Matthew Wolcott and Jennifer Wolcott
||Forum Health Insurance LTD, Underwriters and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and Lexington Insurance Company
||February 10, 2016
||US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
||Benita Y. Pearson
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 12, 2016
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant Forum Health Insurance LTD's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 37 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File An Amended [Supplemental] Complaint (ECF No. 51 ) is granted without opposition. Plaintiffs' Amended Supplemental Complaint Under R.C. 3929.06 (ECF No. 51 -1) is deemed filed as of today, 10/12/2016. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 10/12/2016. (JLG)
|April 14, 2016
Memorandum of Opinion and Order Because Plaintiff has pled sufficient facts pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) to state a claim that Underwriters issued both excess liability and umbrella liability insurance, Defendants Certain Underwriters a t Lloyd's, London (subscribing to Policy No. B0429VHP080059 and any and all renewal policies thereto), and Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (subscribing to Policy No. B0429VHP080059 and any and all renewal policies thereto)'s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5 ) is denied. Responses to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents (ECF No. 1 -2 at PageID #: 72-81) shall be provided within 30 days after the Case Management Conference is held. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 4/14/2016. (JLG)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?