Allen v. Song et al
Robert Allen |
Timothy M. Lanni, Soo C. Song and Warden Christopher Larose |
4:2018cv02846 |
December 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Solomon Oliver |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Supplement (Civil Cover Sheet) to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Robert Allen. Related document(s) #1 . (Y,Br) |
Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in federal custody. Filing fee paid. $5.00. Receipt # 44660004805. Filed by Robert Allen. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Habeas Corpus, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Indictment Memorandum, #4 Application and Affidavit for Disclosure of Prospective GPS/E911 Location Data Relating to a Specified Wireless Telephone) (Y,Br) |
Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Copy of #1 Petition and blank Civil Cover Sheet for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), mailed to Robert Allen at 2240 Hubbard Road, Youngstown, OH 44505 on 12/12/2018. Related document(s) #1 . (Y,Br) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (Y,Br) |
Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case. (Y,Br) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.