Allen v. Wash, et al
| Brandon M. Allen |
| Staffmark Investments, LLC, Danyel Turner and Janet Wash |
| 4:2021cv00845 |
| April 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Benita Y Pearson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Without the Civil Cover Sheet, the Clerk does not know if this case is related to or is a refiling of a pending/terminated case in this Court. Blank copy of Civil Cover Sheet and Copy of #1 Complaint mailed to Brandon M. Allen at #A582991 Ohio State Penitentiary 878 Coitsville-Hubbard Road Youngstown, OH 44505 on 04/23/2021. Related document(s) #1 . (M,MT)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Brandon M. Allen. (M,MT)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against all Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Brandon M. Allen. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents, #2 Exhibit A - Remittance Information, #3 Envelope) (M,MT)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (M,MT)
|
|
Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (M,MT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
