Huff et al. v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al.
| Daniel Huff, Drew Huff, EPO, LLC, EPO2, LLC, DHH Realty, LLC, DAH Realty, LLC, DAH Realty2, LLC, DAH Realty3, LLC, DAH Realty4, LLC and DAH Realty5, LLC |
| Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
| 4:2025cv00165 |
| January 30, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Patricia A Gaughan |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (D,Ju) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-12934689. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 4:23-cv-00509. Filed by DAH Realty, LLC, EPO, LLC, DAH Realty2, LLC, DAH Realty4, LLC, Drew Huff, DAH Realty3, LLC, Daniel Huff, EPO2, LLC, DAH Realty5, LLC, DHH Realty, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (Conlin, Jon) |
| District Judge Patricia A Gaughan assigned to case. (D,Ju) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes, Jr. (D,Ju) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
