Hines v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Northern District Hines v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Hines v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Daniel Hines
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number:	5:2017cv02332
Filed:	November 7, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Akron Office
County:	Summit
Presiding Judge:	Jonathan D. Greenberg
Presiding Judge:	Benita Y. Pearson
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 427
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 21, 2018	Filing 23 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court overrules Plaintiff's Objection to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 21 . The Report and Recommendation is adopted. ECF No. 20 . The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed. Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 11/21/2018. (JLG)
December 7, 2017	Filing 6 Memorandum of Opinion and Order. The Court finds that Plaintiff is not eligible to proceed IFP and his Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (ECF No. 2 ) is hereby denied. To the extent it is not inconsistent wit h this opinion, Magistrate Judge Greenberg's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4 ) is adopted, and Plaintiff's Objection (ECF No. 5 ) is overruled. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days to pay the filing fee of $400.00. If Plaintiff does not pay the filing fee, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 12/7/2017(C,KA)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 21, 2018

Filing 23 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court overrules Plaintiff's Objection to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 21 . The Report and Recommendation is adopted. ECF No. 20 . The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed. Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 11/21/2018. (JLG)

December 7, 2017

Filing 6 Memorandum of Opinion and Order. The Court finds that Plaintiff is not eligible to proceed IFP and his Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (ECF No. 2 ) is hereby denied. To the extent it is not inconsistent wit h this opinion, Magistrate Judge Greenberg's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4 ) is adopted, and Plaintiff's Objection (ECF No. 5 ) is overruled. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days to pay the filing fee of $400.00. If Plaintiff does not pay the filing fee, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 12/7/2017(C,KA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hines v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Hines
Represented By:	Bradley J. Davis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Social Security Administration - Chicago
Represented By:	Erin Brizius
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?