M.J. et al v. Akron City School District Board of Education et al
| M.J. and S. J. |
| Akron City School District Board of Education, Akron City School District, David W. James, Philomena Vincente, Jennifer Ramon, Christopher Hendon and John/Jane Doe |
| 5:2018cv00577 |
| March 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Summit |
| Sara Lioi |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons set forth herein, the Court's disposition of summary judgment motions is as follows: Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 86 , 87 are granted in part. All federal claims are dismissed with prejudice, and the state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. The default judgment against Christopher Hendon (Doc. No. 23 is vacated. Judge Sara Lioi on 4/28/2020. (E,CK)
|
|
Filing
80
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves the discovery dispute noticed in Case No. 5:18-cv-870 at Doc. No. 67 and GRANTS defendants' motions [Case No. 5:18-cv-577, Doc. No. 76 ; Doc. No. 5:18-cv-870, Doc. No. 86] to strike plaintiffs' expert disclosure notice of Harvey S. Rosen. [See Case No. 5:18-cv-577, Doc. No. 75 ; Case No. 5:18-cv-870, Doc. No. 85]. Judge Sara Lioi on 10/3/2019. (O,K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
