Mosholder et al v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
| Krystal Mosholder and Daniel Mosholder |
| Lowe's Home Centers, LLC and Jane Does |
| 5:2018cv01325 |
| June 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Portage |
| Sara Lioi |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendant's 23 Motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, judgment in favor of defendant is entered on the claims in the complaint. The claims against the Jane Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice and this case is closed. Judge Sara Lioi on 3/16/2020. (E,CK)
|
|
Filing
29
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Lowe's unopposed motion for leave to file an answer (Doc. No. 28 ) is granted. Lowe's shall file its answer, in the same form as the proposed answer appended to the instant motion, on or before March 13, 2020. Judge Sara Lioi on 3/11/2020. (D,N)
|
|
Filing
11
Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons set forth herein, defendant Lowe's motion to dismiss is granted as it pertains to plaintiff Krystal Mosholder's claims against Lowe's for strict liability, Ohio's common law lia bility; and bad faith. Lowe's motion to dismiss is denied as it pertains to Krystal Mosholder's premise liability claim and Daniel Mosholder's derivative loss of consortium claim. (Related Doc. No. 6 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 3/11/2019. (P,J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
