Bankert v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Leanne Bankert
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Case Number: 5:2018cv02016
Filed: September 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Sara Lioi
Referring Judge: David A Ruiz
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2018 Filing 8 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail on 9/18/18 executed upon Commissioner of Social Security, Office of Regional Counsel and Attorney General filed on behalf of Leanne Bankert Related document(s) #2 . (C,KA)
September 17, 2018 Filing 7 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon the U.S. Attorney on 9/13/2018 filed on behalf of Leanne Bankert Related document(s) #2 . (S,SR)
September 11, 2018 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Regional Counsel, 70151730000120514168; U.S. Attorney, 70151730000120514182; and Attorney General, 70151730000120514175, placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. (C,KA)
September 6, 2018 Filing 6 Certificate of Notice Pursuant to Magistrate Order filed by Leanne Bankert. (Davis, Bradley)
September 5, 2018 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 9/5/2018. (G,CA)
September 4, 2018 Filing 4 Initial Standing Order. Judge Sara Lioi on 9/4/2018. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A - Witness List, #2 Appendix B - Exhibit List)(P,J)
September 4, 2018 Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (T,Je)
September 4, 2018 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (T,Je)
September 4, 2018 Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8888807.. Filed by Leanne Bankert. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Praecipe, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (Davis, Bradley)
September 4, 2018 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Sara Lioi on 9/4/2018. (T,Je)
September 4, 2018 Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (T,Je)
September 4, 2018 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (T,Je)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bankert v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Represented By: Ruchi Vikram Asher
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leanne Bankert
Represented By: Bradley J. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?