O'Kelly v. Federal Reserve System et al
Plaintiff: Karen O'Kelly
Defendant: Federal Reserve System, Matrix Absence Management, Inc. and Long Term Disability Income Plan For Employees of the Federal Reserve System
Case Number: 5:2019cv02285
Filed: October 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 29:1002
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2019 Filing 7 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Karen O'Kelly. Matrix Absence Management, Inc. waiver sent on 10/17/2019, answer due 12/16/2019 filed on behalf of Karen O'Kelly (Malyuk, Michael)
October 28, 2019 Filing 6 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Karen O'Kelly. Long Term Disability Income Plan For Employees of the Federal Reserve System waiver sent on 10/17/2019, answer due 12/16/2019 filed on behalf of Karen O'Kelly (Malyuk, Michael)
October 28, 2019 Filing 5 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Karen O'Kelly. Federal Reserve System waiver sent on 10/17/2019, answer due 12/16/2019 filed on behalf of Karen O'Kelly (Malyuk, Michael)
October 1, 2019 Filing 4 Supplement - Complaint with Signature, filed by Karen O'Kelly. (Malyuk, Michael)
October 1, 2019 Filing 3 Initial Standing Order. Judge Sara Lioi on 10/01/2019. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A - Witness List, #2 Appendix B - Exhibit List) (M,TL)
October 1, 2019 Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided or issued. (M,TL)
October 1, 2019 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert. (M,TL)
October 1, 2019 Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (M,TL)
October 1, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint For Review of Administrative Denial of Disability Benefits against All Defendants. (Document unsigned.) Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-9550969, filed by Karen O'Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Malyuk, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'Kelly v. Federal Reserve System et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Reserve System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matrix Absence Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Long Term Disability Income Plan For Employees of the Federal Reserve System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen O'Kelly
Represented By: Eric S. McDaniel
Represented By: Michael A. Malyuk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?