Singfield v. Bowen, Jr.
| Phillip Singfield |
| Warden Richard A. Bowen, Jr. |
| 5:2019cv02558 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James S Gwin |
| James R Knepp |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Return of Writ (2254) #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254),, filed by Richard A. Bowen, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Appendix of Bookmarked Exhibits 1-88 to ROW)(Watson, Stephanie) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order. The answer shall comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases, and shall address all legal issues raised in the petition. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the filing of Respondent's answer to respond by filing a reply. Respondent is granted leave of fifteen (15) days from the filing of Petitioner's reply to respond thereto by filing a sur-reply. Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp II on 11/4/2019. (S,JM) |
| Copies of #1 and #3 mailed to Warden Richard A. Bowen, Jr., 878 Coitsville-Hubbard Road, Youngstown, OH 44505, with email copies to Ohio Attorney General's Office on 11/4/2019. (S,JM) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II pursuant to Local Rule 72.2 entered by Judge James S. Gwin on 11/1/2019. (S,KM) |
| Filing 2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (Y,A) |
| Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee paid. $5. Receipt # 14660118574. Filed by Phillip Singfield. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support, #2 Exhibit A- State Habeas Corpus Complaint, #3 Exhibit B- Mahoning County Judgment Entry, #4 Exhibit C- Mahoning County Opinion and Judgment Entry, #5 Exhibit D- Supreme Court of Ohio case announcements, #6 Exhibit E- Summit County Court of Common Pleas Journal Entry, #7 Exhibit F- Summit County Court of Common Pleas Journal Entry) (Y,A) |
| Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Related document(s) #2 , #1 . (Y,A) |
| Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case, (Y,A) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (Y,A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Singfield v. Bowen, Jr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Richard A. Bowen, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie L. Watson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Phillip Singfield | |
| Represented By: | Matthew O. Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
