Armatas v Haws, et al
Steven A. Armatas |
Thomas Ferrara, Scott Michael Haws, John A. Sabo and Albert P. Leno, II |
5:2019cv02667 |
November 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
John R Adams |
Kathleen B Burke |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Steven A. Armatas. Thomas Ferrara waiver sent on 12/9/2019, answer due 2/7/2020 filed on behalf of Steven A. Armatas (Armatas, Steven) |
Filing 8 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Steven A. Armatas. John A. Sabo waiver sent on 12/9/2019, answer due 2/7/2020 filed on behalf of Steven A. Armatas (Armatas, Steven) |
Filing 7 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Steven A. Armatas. Scott Michael Haws waiver sent on 12/9/2019, answer due 2/7/2020 filed on behalf of Steven A. Armatas (Armatas, Steven) |
Filing 6 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Steven A. Armatas. Albert P. Leno, II waiver sent on 12/9/2019, answer due 2/7/2020 filed on behalf of Steven A. Armatas (Armatas, Steven) |
IMPORTANT: Prepare now and avoid delays logging in later. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio [OHND] will be upgrading CM/ECF to the Next Generation of CM/ECF [NextGen] on February 10, 2020. Information regarding NextGen can be found # on the court's website.Preparing for NextGen CM/ECF is a multi-step process. Step one is to obtain or upgrade your PACER account. Currently, attorneys within a firm may share a PACER account. This will not be allowed with NextGen. Each attorney must have their own upgraded PACER account. If you are using a shared PACER account, register for a new PACER account by clicking # here.If you have an upgraded PACER account for another NextGen court or your PACER account was created after August 10, 2014, no further action is required at this time. If neither applies, you must upgrade your legacy PACER account. If this is not done, you will be unable to e-file after February 10, 2020. Instructions for linking your PACER account to your CM/ECF account will be sent in February. If you still have questions, please contact the PACER Service Center at 800-676-6854 or the Clerk's Office Help Desk at 1-800-355-8498. (SL) (ADI) |
Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by James F. Mathews filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Mathews, James) |
Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Tonya J. Rogers filed by on behalf of Thomas Ferrara, Scott Michael Haws, Albert P. Leno, II, John A. Sabo. (Rogers, Tonya) |
Filing 3 Order referring case to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke for general pretrial supervision to include a Report & Recommendation on any dispositive motions. Judge John R. Adams on 11/19/19. (K,C) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided or issued. (M,TL) |
Filing 1 Civil Complaint for Fraud, Violation of Federal Civil Rights, Civil Conspiracy, Unconstitutional Passage of a Bill of Attainder, Declaratory Judgment and Punitive Damages against Thomas Ferrara, Scott Michael Haws, Albert P. Leno, II, John A. Sabo. Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-9627231, filed by Steven A. Armatas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Armatas, Steven) |
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,TL) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (M,TL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.