Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Chick-fil-A, Inc.
| Symbology Innovations, LLC |
| Chick-fil-A, Inc. |
| 5:2020cv01795 |
| August 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Sara Lioi |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case, Judge John R. Adams terminated. (M,TL) |
| Filing 8 Marginal Entry Order approving the re #6 Stipulation. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before 10/16/20. Judge John R. Adams on 9/16/20. (K,C) |
Filing 7
Order of Reassignment. This case is returned to the Clerk for reassignment to Judge Sara Lioi for all further proceedings as related to case #5:20CV1499. Judge John R. Adams on 9/16/20. (K,C)
|
| Filing 6 Proposed Stipulation for Extension of Time up through and including October 16, 2020, to Answer Complaint filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. Related document(s) #1 .(Curfman, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Chick-fil-A, Inc. on 8/26/2020, filed on behalf of Symbology Innovations, LLC. Related document(s) #4 . (O,K) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Chick-fil-A, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7020 0090 00001 4429 0981. (P,G) |
| Filing 4 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Chick-fil-A, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,TL) |
| Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Curfman, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Curfman, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Chick-fil-A, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-10180960. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 5:20-cv-01499. Filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-US8424752, #2 Exhibit B-Claim Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons) (Curfman, Andrew) |
| This action has been identified as a Patent Case that is subject to the Local Patent Rules. Link to #Local Patent Rules. (M,TL) |
| Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,TL) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (M,TL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Chick-fil-A, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chick-fil-A, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Symbology Innovations, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Andrew S. Curfman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
