Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Bernard Jones
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 5:2020cv02065
Filed: September 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Pamela A Barker
Referring Judge: Carmen E Henderson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal executed by FedEx upon the U.S. Attorney on 10/9/2020; upon Commissioner of Social Security on 10/13/2020 and upon U.S. Attorney General on 10/13/2020 (signed C19) filed on behalf of Bernard Jones. (Related document(s) #8 ) (O,K)
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Original Summons, Complaint, and Magistrate Judge's Initial Order issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon the Commissioner of Social Security c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 USM-285) (W,K)
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (W,K)
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson on 9/16/2020. (W,K)
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson on 9/16/2020.(W,K)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,TL)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Certification that Social Security Number Sent to Defendant filed by Bernard Jones. Related document(s) #1 .(Shifrin, Debra)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Bernard Jones. (Shifrin, Debra)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee not paid, IFP, filed by Bernard Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 USM-285) (Shifrin, Debra)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (M,TL)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 09/15/2020. (M,TL)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (M,TL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Cara Staley Rafferty
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernard Jones
Represented By: Debra S. Shifrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?