Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Waffle House, Inc.
Plaintiff: Symbology Innovations, LLC
Defendant: Waffle House, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2020cv02066
Filed: September 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting the stipulated request for an extension of time for defendant to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint until November 30, 2020 (Doc. No. #7 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 10/16/2020. (E,CK)
October 9, 2020 Filing 7 Proposed Stipulation for Extension of Time up through and including November 30, 2020 to Answer #1 Complaint filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Curfman, Andrew)
October 5, 2020 Filing 6 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Waffle House, Inc. on 9/24/2020, filed on behalf of Symbology Innovations, LLC. Related document(s) #4 . (O,K)
September 21, 2020 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Waffle House, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7020 0090 0001 4429 1278. (O,K)
September 15, 2020 Filing 5 Initial Standing Order. Judge Sara Lioi on 09/15/2020. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A - Witness List, #2 Appendix B - Exhibit List) (M,TL)
September 15, 2020 Filing 4 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Waffle House, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,TL)
September 15, 2020 Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Curfman, Andrew)
September 15, 2020 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Patent Asset Management, LLC for Symbology Innovations, LLC filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Curfman, Andrew)
September 15, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint for Infringement of Patent with jury demand against Waffle House, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-10265104. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 1:20-cv-02062. Filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-US8424752, #2 Exhibit B-Claim Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons) (Curfman, Andrew)
September 15, 2020 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (M,TL)
September 15, 2020 This action has been identified as a Patent Case that is subject to the Local Patent Rules. Link to #Local Patent Rules. (M,TL)
September 15, 2020 Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (M,TL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Waffle House, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Waffle House, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Symbology Innovations, LLC
Represented By: Andrew S. Curfman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?