Reese v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Christopher Reese and Christopher M. Reese
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 5:2020cv02385
Filed: October 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Kathleen B Burke
Referring Judge: Benita Y Pearson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Original Summons, Complaint, and Magistrate Judge's Initial Order issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon the Commissioner of Social Security c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 USM-285) (S,HR)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Defendant's Answer, the transcript of the administrative record and the parties' briefs shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 16.3.1, including but not limited to the schedule set forth in that Rule. Any requests for an extension of time shall be filed at least five days prior to the due date for filing. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 11/6/20. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A - Rule 16.3.1)(S,HR)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 & #9 ). Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 11/6/20.(S,HR)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Amended Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Christopher M. Reese. (Shifrin, Debra)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Certification that Social Security Number Sent to Defendant filed by Christopher M. Reese. Related document(s) #1 .(Shifrin, Debra)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FILING ERROR. Original Summons, Complaint, and Magistrate Judge's Initial Order issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon the Commissioner of Social Security c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 USM-285) (S,HR) Modified to note filing error on 10/21/2020 (S,HR).
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (S,HR)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 FILING ERROR. Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Defendant's Answer, the transcript of the administrative record and the parties' briefs shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 16.3.1, including but not limited to the schedule set forth in that Rule. Any requests for an extension of time shall be filed at least five days prior to the due date for filing. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 10/21/20. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A - Rule 16.3.1)(S,HR) Modified to note filing error on 10/21/2020 (S,HR).
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 FILING ERROR. Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 10/21/20.(S,HR) Modified to note filing error on 10/21/2020 (S,HR).
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,TL)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (M,TL)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (M,TL)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 10/21/2020. (M,TL)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]. Plaintiff's #2 IFP application has not been signed as required. Plaintiff is to sign his IFP application and re-submit it. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 10/21/20. (S,HR)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Christopher Reese. Related document(s) #1 . (Shifrin, Debra) Modified on 10/21/2020 (S,HR).
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Christopher Reese. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 USM-285) (Shifrin, Debra)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reese v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Reese
Represented By: Debra S. Shifrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher M. Reese
Represented By: Debra S. Shifrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Lisa Johnson
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?