Pennell v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
| Mackenzie Pennell |
| Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp., |
| 5:2022cv00619 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Mackenzie Pennell. Merck & Co., Inc. waiver sent on 5/20/2022, answer due 7/19/2022; Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp., waiver sent on 5/20/2022, answer due 7/19/2022 filed on behalf of Mackenzie Pennell (Attachments: #1 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(Turner, Tracy) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Merck & Co., Inc., Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,TL) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Merck & Co., Inc., Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp.,. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-11376953.. Filed by Mackenzie Pennell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (Turner, Tracy) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (M,TL) |
| Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,TL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
