Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: James Williams, Jr.
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 5:2022cv00808
Filed: May 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: William H Baughman
Referring Judge: Bridget Meehan Brennan
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order setting procedural schedule as follows: Plaintiff's brief on merits due 08/08/22, Defendant's brief on merits due 09/07/22, Plaintiff's reply, if any, due 09/21/22, Joint certification of meet & confer due 10/05/22. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 07/07/22.(M,MT)
July 6, 2022 Filing 5 Transcript of Proceedings before the Social Security Administration filed by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Related document(s) #1 . (Ina, Rema)
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 05/18/22. (M,MT)
May 18, 2022 Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 5/18/2022. (O,K)
May 18, 2022 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff James Williams, Jr. (Wilson, Rachel)
May 18, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by James Williams, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wilson, Rachel)
May 18, 2022 Judge Bridget Meehan Brennan assigned to case. (O,K)
May 18, 2022 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr.. (O,K)
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 05/18/22.(M,MT)
May 18, 2022 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Bridget Meehan Brennan on 5/18/2022. (O,K)
May 18, 2022 Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (O,K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Williams, Jr.
Represented By: Rachel C. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Rema Alberta Ina
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?