Deskins v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Pierre Deskins |
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
5:2022cv00987 |
June 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
William H Baughman |
Patricia A Gaughan |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until August 22, 2022 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Asher, Ruchi) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 06/09/22. (M,MT) |
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 06/09/22.(M,MT) |
Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 6/8/2022. (P,G) |
Filing 3 DUPLICATE FILING SEE #2 . Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Pierre Deskins. (Gillissie, Rebecca) Modified on 6/8/2022 to note duplicate filing (P,G). |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Pierre Deskins. (Gillissie, Rebecca) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Pierre Deskins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gillissie, Rebecca) |
Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (P,G) |
Judge Patricia A. Gaughan assigned to case. (P,G) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr.. (P,G) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 6/8/2022. (P,G) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Deskins v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Pierre Deskins | |
Represented By: | Rebecca R. Gillissie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Ruchi Vikram Asher |
Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.