Scott-Whitney v. American Honda Finance Corporation et al.
| Carolyn Scott-Whitney |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., American Honda Finance Corporation doing business as Honda Financial Services, Trans Union LLC and Equifax Information Services LLC |
| 5:2024cv01524 |
| September 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon American Honda Finance Corporation, Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Trans Union LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,DL) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 405.00. Receipt number AOHNDC-12725812. Filed by Carolyn Scott-Whitney. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons American Honda Finance Corp, #3 Summons Experian Information Solutions, Inc., #4 Summons Equifax Information Services LLC, #5 Summons Trans Union LLC) (Levin, David) |
| Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (B,DL) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (B,DL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
