Wilcox v. Ohio Penal Industries et al
Toby D. Wilcox |
Ohio Penal Industries, Oral Gulley, William Lizak and Dave Proehl |
1:2007cv00554 |
July 19, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
FRANKLIN |
Susan J. Dlott |
Timothy S Hogan |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 43 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly 36 Motion to Dismiss filed by Dave Proehl, Oral Gulley, Ohio Penal Industries, William Lizak is DENIED. (wam1) |
Filing 43 ORDER denying plaintiff's 40 MOTION to Substitute Party. It is further ORDERED that counsel for defendant Lizak file an Amended Suggestion of Death within (14) days of the filing date of this Order. It is Recommended that defendants' 36 MOTION to Dismiss be Denied. ( Objections to R&R due by 11/23/2009). Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S Hogan on 11/4/2009. (art) |
Filing 4 ORDER by Judge Susan J. Dlott that the claims against defendants Ohio Penal Industries and Dave Proehl are DISMISSED. With respect to the complaint against defendants Gulley and Lizak, it is ORDERED that the US Marshal serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and this order upon defendants Gulley and Lizak. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (scot1, ) Additional attachment # 2 Certified Return Receipt added on 8/8/2007 (tt1, ). Modified on 8/8/2007 - To identify attachment (tt1, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.