Sansom v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone
Plaintiff: Karen Sansom
Defendant: Cincinnati Bell Telephone
Case Number: 1:2008cv00235
Filed: April 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: HAMILTON
Presiding Judge: Herman J. Weber
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 35 Motion to Strike. This case shall proceed to trial in accordance with the schedule established by the Court. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 10/19/09. (do)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sansom v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen Sansom
Represented By: David Gerard Torchia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cincinnati Bell Telephone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?