Info-Hold, Inc. v. Applied Media Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff: Info-Hold, Inc.
Defendant: Applied Media Technologies Corporation
Case Number: 1:2008cv00802
Filed: November 14, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Patent Office
County: HIGHLAND
Presiding Judge: Michael R. Barrett
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 59 CLERK'S JUDGMENT AFFIRMING ORDER 58 . (mr1)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 4/25/2013. (mr1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Info-Hold, Inc. v. Applied Media Technologies Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Info-Hold, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Applied Media Technologies Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?