Barton v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Thomas Barton
Respondent: Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Institution
Case Number: 1:2009cv00353
Filed: May 19, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: WARREN
Presiding Judge: Timothy S. Black
Presiding Judge: S Arthur Spiegel
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER - It is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 65 ) be, and it hereby is, adopted as the finding of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that this case be, and it hereby is, DISMISSED AS MOOT.. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 10/25/2016. (jee)
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 65 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The prior judgment having been vacated, the above-captioned case should be dismissed as moot. re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Thomas Barton. Objections to R&R due by 10/17/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 9/30/16. (pb)
August 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 53 JUDGMENT entered by Clerk affirming Court Order 52 . (km1)
February 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 49 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. it is respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. It is also recommended that Petitioner be granted a certificate of appealability on his First Ground for Relief, but denied a certificate of appealability on Grounds Two and Three. Objections to R&R due by 2/27/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 2/7/2012. (mdf1)
June 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 42 DECISION AND ORDER - The Order granting in part Petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing (Doc. No. 29) is VACATED and Respondent's appeal (Doc. No. 31) is moot. The record in this case is now complete. Counsel shall advise the Court not later than June 20, 2011, whether they desire to file additional briefing on the merits. If so, the Court requests counsel agree, if possible on a briefing schedule. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/8/2011. (kpf1)
April 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING - This case is before the Court on consideration of Respondent's Notice of Supplemental Authority (Doc. No. 37), calling the Court's attention to Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. ___, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2616 (Apr. 4 , 2011). The Magistrate Judge agrees that his Decision and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (Doc. No. 29) requires reconsideration in light of Cullen. It is accordingly ordered that Petitione r file any memorandum he wishes the Court to consider on the impact of the Cullen decision not later than April 29, 2011. Respondent may reply not later than seven calendar days after Petitioner's memorandum is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/19/2011. (kpf1)
August 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT - It is accordingly ORDERED that Doc. No. 20, captioned as "Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment," be stricken, without prejudice to the arguments made therein on the merits, which of course are also made in the duplicate filing at Doc. No. 19. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 8/4/2010. (kpf1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barton v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas Barton
Represented By: Christopher J Pagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?