Muhammad v. Barney et al
| Chris Shabazz Muhammad |
| Barney, L Mahlman, Brian Payne and Troy Howard |
| 1:2009cv00547 |
| July 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Timothy S Hogan |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
2
TRANSFER ORDER - This case is before the Court for initial review upon filing. The Court notes that all of the Defendants in this case are employed at the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility. Therefore, pursuant to S. D. Ohio Civ. R. 82.1(c), this ca se must be adjudicated in the Eastern Division of this District at Columbus and the case is hereby ORDERED transferred to Columbus for reassignment. For the benefit of the reviewing judicial officers at Columbus, the Court notes: 1. Although the Com plaint recites that Plaintiff is an inmate at SOCF, he has in fact been released and filed his Complaint in person at the Dayton Clerk's Office. 2. Because he has been released, Plaintiff may not be a prisoner within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Title VIII of P.L. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321(effective April 26, 1996)(the "PLRA"). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/30/2009. (kopf1, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
