Graff et al v. Haverhill North Coke Company et al
Plaintiff: Glenn Graff, Kelly Graff, Hildreth Maddox and Peggy Maddox
Defendant: Haverhill North Coke Company and Suncoke Energy, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00670
Filed: September 14, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: SCIOTO
Presiding Judge: Susan J. Dlott
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 7413 (b) Clean Air Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 291 ORDER re 277 Brief filed by Peggy Maddox, Kelly Graff, Hildreth Maddox, Glenn Graff, and 278 Brief, filed by Suncoke Energy, Inc., Haverhill North Coke Company. The subclaims stated in paragraphs 12029, 13036, 13741, 15458, 15962, 1 6367, 17780, 18184, 18992, and 19396 of the First Cause of Action are DISMISSED as precluded by the Consent Decree in the Illinois case. The Second Cause of Action is DISMISSED. The subclaims stated in paragraphs 11719, 14245, 14653, 16876, 18588, 197200, and 20103 of the First Cause of Action are NOT DISMISSED. The Third Cause of Action is NOT DISMISSED. Finally, by agreement of the parties, the Fourth through Tenth Causes of Action are NOT DISMISSED.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 6/16/15. (wam)
March 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 260 CLAW-BACK ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/28/2014. (art)
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 251 ORDER following informal discovery/status conference held on 2/20/2014. Defendant's are ordered to advise plaintiffs of the proposed deadline for production of documents from the custodial search by 2/28/2014. Plaintiffs have by oral motion re quested an extension of time until 2/25/2014 to file their response to defendants' 247 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel. Defendants do not object. Therefore plaintiffs' oral motion is Granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/21/2014. (art)
February 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 248 ORDER granting plaintiffs' 214 Motion to Vacate confidentiality designations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/3/2014. (art)
January 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 245 ORDER following 244 Informal Discovery Conference. The parties are ordered to jointly propose a process for discovery of documents regarding the six custodians identified by plaintiffs. the parties shall specify the terms upon which they agree an d the terms upon which they disagree for resolution by the Court. The parties are to contact the Court upon finalization of the proposal to schedule a date for a follow up status conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/16/2014. (art)
December 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 232 ORDER following Informal 231 Discovery conference. Status conference via telephone is set for Monday, 12/9/2013 at 3:00 pm. Plaintffs shall submit the proposal to defendants and to the Court prior to the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/5/2013. (art)
October 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 212 ORDER following Informal 211 Discovery Conference held this date. Defendants are to produce materials on or before 10/25/2013. A follow-up conference will be held on 10/31/2013 at 2:00 pm. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/17/2013. (art)
October 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 208 ORDER following 206 Informal Discovery Conference. Plaintiffs' request to share documents designated as confidential with governmental regulators is Denied pursuant to the Court's 2/28/2011 65 Order regarding modifying the protective order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/30/2013. (art)
November 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 188 ORDER regarding outstanding discovery dispute. As fact discovery has been suspended through 1/31/2013, for the documents that the Court has determined no privilege or protection applies, defendants shall produce such documents to plaintiffs by 2/1/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/13/2012. (art)
November 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 187 ORDER that the following deadlines will replace the deadlines set forth in the 8/15/2012 scheduling order. Fact discovery is suspended through 1/31/2013; Fact discovery shall commence on 2/1/2013; Fact Discovery deadline set for 6/17/2013; Deadline for identifying plaintiffs' expert witnesses and producing expert reports is 8/15/2013; Deadline for identifying defendants' expert witnessesses and producing expert reports set for 10/15/2013; Deadline for identifying rebuttal expert witne sses and producing expert reports set for 11/18/2013; Expert Discovery deadline set for 12/30/2013; Dispositive motion deadline set for 1/29/2014; Memorandum in opposition deadline set for 3/19/2014; Reply Memorandum deadline set for 4/7/2014; Final Pretrial Conference before Judge Susan J. Dlott tentatively set for 6/2014; Trial before Judge Susan J. Dlott tentatively set for 8/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/1/2012. (art)
May 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 158 ORDER that the briefing schedule will be amended: Defendant shall file their brief in support of their asserted privileges for the identified (99) documents on or before 5/15/2012; Plaintiff shall file their response brief on or before 6/5/2012; Defendants shall file their reply brief on or before 6/19/2012; Plaintiffs shall file their sur-reply brief on or before 7/3/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/1/2012. (art)
April 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 157 ORDER following telephone 156 Discovery Conference/Hearing regarding outstanding discovery matters. Defendants shall produce the re-organized privilege log on or before 4/10/2012; The parties shall provide the Court the list of (110) documents fo r in camera review on or before 4/13/2012; Defendant shall provide copies of these (110) douments in both their original redacted and un-redacted forms, to the Court on or before 4/27/2012; Defendants shall file their brief in support of their assert ed privileges for the identified (100) documents on or before 5/4/2012; Plaintiffs shall file their response brief on or before 5/25/2012; Defendants shall file their reply brief on or before 6/8/2-12; Plaintiff shall file their sur-reply brief on or before 6/22/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/5/2012. (art)
March 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 152 ORDER following telephone status/discovery conference held before the Court. This matter is set for a telephone hearing on 3/26/2012 at 2:00 pm. The parties must submit a joint statement by 3/19/2012 setting forth the specific categories of documen ts for which the privilege claim is contested. Defendant must also submit a sampling of documents from each category for in camera review by 3/19/2012. With respect to the supplementation of the privilege log, the parties must submit briefs to the Court by 3/19/2012. To facilitate the parties in briefing the issue, defendants agreed to submit to plaintiffs a proposal for supplementation on or before 3/12/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/1/2012. (art)
February 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 150 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiffs' 139 MOTION for Sanctions be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 3/19/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/28/2012. (art)
April 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGES ORDERS ENTERED ON DECEMBER 22, 2010 AND MARCH 24, 2011 AND OVERRULING OBJECTIONS THERETO. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott. (wam1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graff et al v. Haverhill North Coke Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glenn Graff
Represented By: Justin Derek Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly Graff
Represented By: Justin Derek Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hildreth Maddox
Represented By: Justin Derek Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peggy Maddox
Represented By: Justin Derek Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Haverhill North Coke Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Suncoke Energy, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?