Patrick v. Warden Ohio State Penitentiary

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Patrick v. Warden Ohio State Penitentiary

Patrick v. Warden Ohio State Penitentiary

Petitioner:	David Patrick
Respondent:	Warden Ohio State Penitentiary
Case Number:	1:2011cv00067
Filed:	February 4, 2011
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	HAMILTON
Presiding Judge:	William O. Bertelsman
Presiding Judge:	Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 18, 2012	Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS ORDERED that the objections to the Report and Recommendation be, and they hereby are, denied; that the Report and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclu sions of law of this Court; that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be, and it hereby is, denied; that this matter be dismissed, with prejudice, and stricken from the docket of this court. A separate Judgment shall enter concurrently herewith. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 5/17/2012. (jlw)
March 19, 2012	Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and this Court s hould certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would not be taken in objective good faith and should therefore not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 4/5/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/19/2012. (kpf1)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 18, 2012

Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS ORDERED that the objections to the Report and Recommendation be, and they hereby are, denied; that the Report and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclu sions of law of this Court; that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be, and it hereby is, denied; that this matter be dismissed, with prejudice, and stricken from the docket of this court. A separate Judgment shall enter concurrently herewith. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 5/17/2012. (jlw)

March 19, 2012

Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and this Court s hould certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would not be taken in objective good faith and should therefore not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 4/5/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/19/2012. (kpf1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patrick v. Warden Ohio State Penitentiary
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: David Patrick
Represented By:	Melissa Mary Prendergast
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Ohio State Penitentiary
Represented By:	M Scott Criss
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?