Vaught v. Hartford
| Sheila Vaught |
| Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company |
| Sheila Vaught |
| Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company |
| 1:2011cv00227 |
| April 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Herman J. Weber |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER denying 21 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 22 Motion ; adopting Report and Recommendation 31 . This case is Remanded to the Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company to complete the administrative review process. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 8/15/12. (do1)
|
|
Filing
31
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 22 MOTION overturn administrative decision of defendant re 18 Notice (Other),,, filed by Sheila Vaught, 21 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law filed by Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co mpany: that defendants' motion for judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. 21) be DENIED; plaintiff's cross motion (Doc. 22) be DENIED; and this matter be REMANDED to Hartford to complete the administrative review process. Objections to R&R due by 8/2/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 7/16/12. (jl1)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 8/31/11. (do1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
