Chapman v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
| Maurice Chapman, Sr. |
| Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution |
| 1:2011cv00560 |
| August 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| William O. Bertelsman |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman ADOPTING 16 Report and Recommendations and 20 Supplemental Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that the objections of petitioner to the Report and Recommendation and Supplemental Report and Reco mmendation be, and they hereby are overruled; that the Report and Recommendation as well as the Supplemental Report and Recommendation be, and they hereby are, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that the petition fo r writ of habeas corpus be dismissed with prejudice; that no Certificate of Appealability shall be issued herein; that with respect to any application by petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis the Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3). (eh1)
|
|
Filing
20
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge again respectfully recommends that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Mr. Chapman should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 8/20/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 8/2/2012. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Re: 4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Maurice Chapman, Sr: Based on the foregoing analysis, the Magistrate Judge respectfully recommends that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed with prejudi ce. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Mr. Chapman should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 7/2/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/15/12. (cib1)
|
|
Filing
14
TRANSFER ORDER - With the consent of both of them, the reference in the above-captioned case is hereby transferred from The Honorable Stephanie K. Bowman to The Honorable Michael R. Merz June 11, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 06/11/2012. (kf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chapman v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Maurice Chapman, Sr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
