Short v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: William Short
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2012cv00574
Filed: July 30, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: BUTLER
Presiding Judge: Stephanie K. Bowman
Presiding Judge: Susan J. Dlott
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: plaintiffs motion for approval of attorneys fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b) is granted in part. The requested fee is reduced to an award that reflects a payment to counsel of $3,081.25 out of the past-due benefits award which, when added to her prior receipt of $3,500 under the Equal Access for Justice Act, amounts to compensation that is reasonable under the circumstances. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 7/21/2015. (jlw)
December 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 18 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, plaintiffs motion for fee (Doc. 16) is DENIED as moot in light of the parties filed joint stipulation of fees.Pursuant to the parties stipulation (Doc. 17), plaintiff is awarded the total sum of $3,500.00 in attorneys fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act.. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott. (wam1)
December 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 16 MOTION for Attorney Fees pursuant to EAJA, 17 Stipulation for Attorney Fees. It is RECOMMENDED that: (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Fees 16 be DENIED as moot in light of the parties' later filed joint st ipulation of fees; and (2) Pursuant to the parties' stipulation 17 , Plaintiff be awareded the total sum of $3,500.00 in attorney fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Objections to R&R due by 12/19/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 12/2/2013. (km1)
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER adopting 13 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff Disability Insurance Benefits is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g). This case is hereby TERMINATED. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 7/31/13. (mtw)
July 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Complaint filed by William Short: that decision of Commissioner be REVERSED and REMANDED and this case be CLOSED. Objections to R&R due by 7/29/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 7/10/13. (jl1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Short v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Short
Represented By: Lisa S Hollifield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John J Stark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?