Geary v. UC Health et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 19, 2015
ORDER by Judge Susan J. Dlott ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; defendatns motion for summary judgment is granted; plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice; case is terminated. (vp)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|May 1, 2014
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 28 Report and Recommendations, 23 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Drake Center, UC Health The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistra te Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on March 21, 2014 (Doc. 28), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired April 7, 2014, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, in light of plaintiffs withdrawal of her fraud or negligence claims, defendants motion to dismiss those two claims (Doc. 23) are DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 5/1/2014. (jlw)
|March 21, 2014
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 23 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Fraud and Negligence Claims in Second Amended Complaint. It is RECOMMENDED that this motion be DENIED AS MOOT. Objections to R&R due by 4/7/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 3/21/2014. (km1)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?