Andwan v. Greenhills, Village of et al
Plaintiff: Patricia A. Andwan
Defendant: Thomas E. Doyle, Andrew Moore, Robert Dean, Anne Ward and Greenhills, Village of
Case Number: 1:2013cv00624
Filed: September 9, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: HAMILTON
Presiding Judge: Sandra S Beckwith
Presiding Judge: Stephanie K. Bowman
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 246 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 219 Report and Recommendation granting granting 199 , 200 Motions for Summary Judgment; denying 234 Motion to Stay; denying 235 Motion to Dismiss; granting 236 Motion; finding as moot 237 Motion to Intervene; granting 238 Motion; finding as moot 239 Motion to Stay; finding as moot 243 Motion to Strike; overruling 213 Objection to Magistrate Judge Order. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/28/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 231 ORDER denying 228 First MOTION to Intervene Issue Injunction to halt demolition. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 10/13/17. (eh)
August 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 219 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 199 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Gregory F Lester, 200 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Greenhills, Village of, Andrew D. Moore. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Defendants' motions for summ ary judgment on all claims 199 200 be GRANTED, and that this case be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 9/5/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 8/21/2017. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 194 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 193 Second Motion for Reconsideration for reconsideration of the Court's prior orders denying her the appointment of counsel and/or additional stays of this litigat ion. A courtesy copy of this Order shall be transmitted to Dr. Patrick Swanson at Talbert House, 5837 Hamilton Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45224. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 1/18/17. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 127 MEMORANDUM ORDER: It is Ordered that Plaintiff's motion to stay, motion for extension of time until her case file is produced, and motion to compel production of her case file (Docs. 117, 118) are DENIED AS MOOT in light of the production of her case file to her by her most recent counsel. Her request for a copy of the parties' Rule 26(f) report is similarly denied based upon the filing of the same in the record of this case. (See Doc. 75); Plaintiff� 39;s motion to amend/correct Judge Beckwith's prior order granting Mr. Conway's motion to withdraw as counsel (Doc. 123) is DENIED on grounds that the undersigned does not find the Court's order to be prejudicial; The dead line for completion of fact discovery is hereby EXTENDED until July 30, 2015; Except as to the deadline for fact discovery, the ruling on Plaintiff's pending motion for an extension of time, motion to compel, and motion to schedule an i n-person case management conference (Doc. 125) will be STAYED until the filing of a formal response by Defendants or the expiration of time for doing so; In order to minimize further delay, Defendants shall file a written response to Plaintiff's pending motion (Doc. 125) on or before July 8, 2015; The Clerk of Court shall mail a courtesy copy of this order to former counsel, Mr. Conway, by regular United States mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 6/30/15. (sct) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
April 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 114 ORDER granting 110 Defendant Village of Greenhills & Andrew Moore' Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings and enters judgment in their favor on plaintiff's claim for common law assault and batters. The Village of Greenhills is also entitled to judgment on the claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress. The case remains pending on the claims against the Village of Greenhills, Officer Moore, and Gregory Lester. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 4/15/15. (mb)
February 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER finding as moot [78-81] Motions to Dismiss; adopting report & recommendation. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 2/23/15. (mb)
December 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 68 ; denying 83 Motion to Strike. Plaintiff's objections are overruled. This matter is committed to Mag. Judge. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 12/24/14. (mb)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andwan v. Greenhills, Village of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia A. Andwan
Represented By: Stephen R Felson
Represented By: Lisa Talmadge Meeks
Represented By: Robert Brand Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas E. Doyle
Represented By: Michael S Loughry
Represented By: Robert Henry Stoffers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Moore
Represented By: Michael S Loughry
Represented By: Robert Henry Stoffers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Dean
Represented By: Michael S Loughry
Represented By: Robert Henry Stoffers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anne Ward
Represented By: Michael S Loughry
Represented By: Robert Henry Stoffers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greenhills, Village of
Represented By: Michael S Loughry
Represented By: Robert Henry Stoffers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?