Heid v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
||Ray Scott Heid
||Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
||March 19, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
||Timothy S. Black
||Stephanie K. Bowman
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 25, 2017
DECISION AND ENTRY Adopting 15 the Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and Overruling 18 Petitioner's Objections. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 9/22/17. (gs) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|May 22, 2017
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 9 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: (1) Respondent's motion to dismiss 9 be GRANTED, and petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 1 be DISMISSED with prejudice on the ground that it is time-barred; (2) a certificate of appealability should not issue with respect to any of the claims for relief alleged in the petition; (3) the Court certify that an appeal would not be taken in &qu ot;good faith," and therefore DENY Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis upon a showing of financial necessity. Objections to R&R due by 6/5/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/22/2017. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?