Campbell v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Roscoe T. Campbell
Respondent: Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Case Number: 1:2016cv00411
Filed: March 23, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: WARREN
Presiding Judge: Timothy S. Black
Presiding Judge: Stephanie K. Bowman
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 27 ). Petitioner's objections to the June 7, 2017 Report and Recommendations (Doc. 26 ), construed by this Court as a motion to amend the j udgment under Rule 59(e), are DENIED. A certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to any of the grounds for relief alleged in the petition because petitioner has not stated a "viable claim of the denial of a constitutional right, " nor are the issues presented "adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 475 (2000) (citing Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 & n.4 (1983)); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed . R. App. P. 22(b); The Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore Petitioner is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 1/25/18. (jlm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION TO AMEND THE JUDGMENT - It is respectfully recommended that the Objections, construed as a motion to amend, be DENIED. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be deni ed a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 10/24/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/10/2017. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 24 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability shall not issue with respec t to any of the grounds for relief alleged in the petition because petitioner has not stated a "viable claim of the denial of a constitutional right," nor are the issues presented "adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." The Court certifies that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore Petitioner is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis. This case is TERMINATED in this Court. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 10/5/17. (gs) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge respectfully recommends that the Petition be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 6/21/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 6/7/2017. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Campbell v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roscoe T. Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Represented By: Maura O'Neill Jaite
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?