Carter v. United States of America et al
Orlando Carter, r |
United States of America and United States Attorney's Office |
1:2016cv00530 |
May 6, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
COLUMBIANA |
Michael R. Barrett |
Karen L. Litkovitz |
Freedom of Information Act |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 14 Report and Recommendation granting 8 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 9 Motion to Amend/Correct; finding as moot 11 Motion for TRO; finding as moot 13 Motion for Order to ; finding as moot 18 Motion for Declaratory Judgment; finding as moot 18 Motion to Expedite; finding as moot 19 Motion for Hearing; finding as moot 20 Motion for Order to; finding as moot 20 Motion ; finding as moot 22 Motion. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/20/17. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' 8 MOTION to Dismiss be Granted. Objections to R&R due by 9/2/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/16/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.