Hamm v. Southern Ohio Medical Center
Plaintiff: Jeremy Hamm
Defendant: Southern Ohio Medical Center
Case Number: 1:2016cv00935
Filed: September 19, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: PIKE
Presiding Judge: Timothy S. Black
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER denying as moot 25 Joint Motion to File the Settlement Agreement Under Seal, granting 26 Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and Dismiss the Case, and Dismissing the Case with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/16/17. (sct)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamm v. Southern Ohio Medical Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeremy Hamm
Represented By: Carrie J. Dyer
Represented By: Gregory R Mansell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southern Ohio Medical Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?